During the establishment of a solar park with a large area requirement, a preliminary problem arises that legal entity investors cannot acquire the ownership of property outside the scope of the Land Transfer Act until it is taken out of agricultural use. For this reason, there are two ways to change the land use prior to the first phase of the investment. One is the acquisition of the right of use under the scope of the Land Transfer Act and the subsequent securing of the ownership of the area with a pre-purchase agreement, while the other is the acquisition of ownership through the intervention of the local government.

The article considers the writ proceedings as a simplified form of resolution of civil cases in courts of general jurisdiction, aimed at optimizing justice. To date, the issue of the effectiveness of writ proceedings is relevant, as the analysis of law enforcement practice demonstrates a number of problems associated with the procedure of issuing a court writ, its issuance and revocation. The authors have identified controversial aspects of writ proceedings, expressed by insufficient legislative regulation, requiring clarification or amendments to the current norms of civil procedure legislation, and the difficulties of implementation of writ proceedings in practice (procedural activity of courts and bodies carrying out the enforcement of court writ). The advantages distinguishing the court order for the fulfillment of the main objective of justice — the protection of legitimate rights and interests, are considered. The authors have formulated proposals for improvement of the current procedural legislation, allowing to eliminate the shortcomings of the writ proceedings. These include the legislative fixation of the provision that a court writ can be canceled only for a number of clearly defined reasons, the establishment in the legislation of a prohibition to resubmit an application for issuance of a court writ with the same requirement if such first requirement was rejected or if the debtor objects to the court writ.

The article is focused on the problem of the usage of civil burial grounds, while observing the balance of public and private interests. Ensuring the rational use and protection of burial grounds, sometimes opposing interests, in modern contexts, is a very important task of land legislation, and it is necessary to establish this balance as cultural traditions, religious beliefs, family ties are involved, and the state has to put this activity in the legal framework. When developing the lands of military burial grounds, public interests are of special importance in the context of regulating the use of these territories, since the lands on which the lands of military burial grounds are located are the subject of special attention from the state and society, are of historical and memorial value, as well as being objects of memory about the historical history. At the same time, the responsibility for the conservation of these lands and their correct and rational use lies with local self-government bodies.

The article reviews the principle of inviolability of private property in the context of Russian legislation, starting from its enshrinement in the Fundamental State Laws of 1906 and up to the modern Constitution of the Russian Federation. The author analyzes the evolution of this principle, its theoretical understanding, as well as the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Two key aspects of inviolability are considered: the right to inviolability as the ability to be protected from encroachments and actual inviolability as the state of property protected by the state. Special attention is paid to various interpretations and legal approaches to the limitation of this principle, including the obligations of the state to protect the rights of owners and the balance of interests of private and public parties. The article discusses practical mechanisms for the protection of private property, including exclusion from the enforcement of court decisions as well as compensation when property is confiscated for state needs.

The main idea of the article is the importance of the Kazan International Legal Forum as a platform for promoting the ideas of legal modernization and raising the level of legal literacy in business. The forum aims at objectives such as positioning lawyers as intermediaries between business and government, developing skills for effective business support, predicting the future of the legal profession, and promoting international cooperation. These objectives emphasize a modern approach to law, which is not limited to legal norms, but also includes a wide range of social and economic factors. The Forum emphasizes the importance of interaction between the state and society, the creation of a proactive legal community and the development of tools necessary for successful law enforcement practice in the light of new challenges.