To the problem of definition of possession
https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2022-7-2-63-72
Abstract
The question of defining the concept of «possession» is due to the high importance of this phenomenon in civil turnover. Possession represents the foundation of the majority of civil-law relations connected with possession or domination over a thing. Such a position of ownership determines close attention of law researchers to the issues of ownership and, at the same time, a special caution of both domestic and foreign legislators in defining legal categories related to ownership.
At present, the topic of ownership and its problems are very widely covered in special literature. Researchers have been asking questions of possession, qualification, and consequences of its violation since the emergence of ancient concepts of belonging of a thing to a particular subject (including corporate) in general, but given the changing views on the world around, on the concept of «possession» and issues related to its protection, the specified problematic do not lose its relevance at present.
The need for theoretical development of the issues associated with the definition of the term «possession» is largely due to the fact that modern law and order oft en leave open the question of determining the essence of the concept and its essential features.
About the Authors
G. ValeevaRussian Federation
Guzel Valeeva – Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and Methods of Teaching Law
18 Kremlin St., Kazan, 420008
M. Vekshin
Russian Federation
Mikhail Vekshin – Master's Degree Student of the Faculty of Law of the Department of Environmental, Labor Law and Civil Procedure
18 Kremlin St., Kazan, 420008
R. Khasanshin
Russian Federation
Ramil Khasanshin – Candidate of Legal Sciences of the Faculty of Law of the Department of Environmental, Labor Law and Civil Procedure
18 Kremlin St., Kazan, 420008
Review
For citations:
Valeeva G., Vekshin M., Khasanshin R. To the problem of definition of possession. Kazan University Law Review. 2022;7(2):63-72. https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2022-7-2-63-72