Preview

Kazan University Law Review

Advanced search

The adversarial principle in the discourse of simplified proceedings

https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2024-9-2-95-97

Abstract

The article is devoted to the current issue of implementation of the adversarial principle of the parties in the consideration of disputes in the framework of simplified procedure. Administration of justice is the cornerstone of any legal system, and the procedure of court proceedings plays a key role in ensuring fairness and equality. In this context, the adversarial principle acts as a fundamental principle that seeks to balance the scales of justice by allowing opposing parties to present their cases before an objective judge. This principle becomes particularly intriguing when viewed in the context of summary proceedings, a procedural framework designed to streamline and expedite legal processes. The authors of the study identify the distinctive features of simplified proceedings and outline the points that allow to determine the sufficiency in the implementation of the mentioned principle

About the Authors

A. B. Batueva
V. V. Lukyanov Orel Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation

Altani Batueva  — Police officer, cadet

2 Ignatova St., Orel, Orel region, 302027



S. V. Melnik
V. V. Lukyanov Orel Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation

Sergey Melnik  — Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Civil law disciplines

2 Ignatova St., Orel, Orel region, 302027



References

1. Sedykh E. O. Realizatsiya prava na sostyazatelnost i ravnopravie v uproshchennom proizvodstve [The realization of the right to adversarial proceedings and equality of rights in simplified proceedings] // Vestnik magistratury [Bulletin of the Master’s Degree Program]. 2019. No. 7-2 (94). Pp. 157–159. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Batueva A.B., Melnik S.V. The adversarial principle in the discourse of simplified proceedings. Kazan University Law Review. 2024;9(2):95-97. https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2024-9-2-95-97

Views: 48


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8823 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7885 (Online)