This article examines the issue of interaction between the human rights system of the states of the Eurasian space within the framework of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), as well as the place and role of the OIC in the protection and promotion of human rights at the global level. The article focuses on the specifics of cooperation between countries in the region in the field of human rights, taking into account their cultural, religious and historical characteristics, as well as an analysis of the problems and opportunities associated with the interaction of human rights systems in the context of the OIC, including issues of cultural relativism and religious interpretations of human rights.

The article should be useful for researchers and specialists in the field of human rights, international law and Islamic studies, representatives of government agencies and non-governmental organizations involved in human rights issues, students and anyone interested in the topic of human rights in the Eurasian region and the role of the OIC in this area.

The purpose of the article is to increase understanding of the peculiarities of interaction between the human rights systems of the states of the Eurasian space within the framework of the OIC, to identify factors that promote and hinder effective cooperation in the field of human rights, to offer recommendations for strengthening interaction and developing dialogue between the countries of the region.

The article provides information regarding the theoretical and philosophical heritage of Abu Nasr Farabi, thanks to which the West was able to restore the theoretical heritage of the philosophers of Ancient Greece and Rome, which subsequently opened the way to the Renaissance of science in the Middle Ages and contributed to the development of various branches of science, from logic to political and legal doctrines. The Farabi method, which embodies a rational approach to solving practical problems, can also be used at the present time, when legal science is exposed to digital influence and transformed into a more advanced system of quantum online control over momentarily emerging legal relations on the Internet, which will allow identifying the data offender relationships. In other words, legal control over society will be global in nature.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has gained prominence globally as a mechanism for resolving conflicts outside traditional court systems. In South Africa, ADR is not only a pragmatic response to judicial inefficiencies but also a constitutional tool for promoting access to justice, equality, and participatory democracy. However, the ethical dimensions of ADR, particularly in contexts marked by socio-economic disparities and cultural pluralism, pose significant challenges. This paper explores these ethical dilemmas within South Africa’s ADR framework and compares them with similar issues in other BRICS nations. It argues that South Africa’s unique blend of transformative constitutionalism and the ethical philosophy of Ubuntu offers a compelling model for ethically grounded ADR. The paper concludes by proposing strategies for strengthening ethical standards and fostering BRICS-wide cooperation in dispute resolution.