The main concepts of guilt and the particularities of their representation in Russian criminal law
https://doi.org/10.31085/2310-8681-2020-5-281-179-202
Аннотация
Guilt is an obligatory feature of a crime under the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Code)1 . However, there is no legal definition of guilt in the Code, as well as in most criminal laws of foreign countries. Understanding of guilt is sometimes contradictory in the doctrine so the authors consider the main concepts to present a holistic understanding of the formula of guilt in Russian Criminal Law: psychological concept, evaluative (normative) and dangerous state of mind.
Guilt is a criminal law concept and therefore has psychological, social and legal (criminal law) content. In Russian Criminal Law, it is usually considered within the framework of its social and psychological interpretation. At the same time, echoes of the other two concepts can be found, for example, in the interpretation of negligence as a form of guilt (Part 3, Article 26 of the Code) and criminal responsibility for taking the highest position in the criminal hierarchy (Article 2101 of the Code) due to the fact that certain elements of external assessment (normative concept) and subjective imputation (theory of a dangerous state of mind) can be seen in the construction of these rules by the legislator.
The paper strongly focuses on the analysis of the individual basic elements, attributes, components of the phenomenon in question and their relationship to each other: guilt and guiltiness, intellectual and volitional elements, knowledge, awareness, foreknowledge, understanding, desire, presumption, indifference and calculation.
Ключевые слова
guilt,
concepts of guilt,
subjective side of a crime,
elements of crime,
motive,
purpose,
intent,
carelessness,
direct intent,
indirect intent,
thoughtlessness,
negligence,
forms of guilt,
knowledge,
will,
awareness,
foreknowledge,
understanding,
intellectual moment,
volitional moment
Об авторах
A. Rarog
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Россия
Россия
A. Tarhanov
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University
Россия
Россия
R. Gayfutdinov
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. [Kratkiy fi losofskiy slovar’] Brief Dictionary of Philosophy / A. P. Alekseev, G. G. Vasiliev et al; Edited by A. P. Alekseev. M.: ТК Velbi, Prospekt Publisher, 2004.
2. [Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava: Prestuplenie] Course of Soviet Criminal Law: Crime. In 6 volumes: General Part. V. 2 / A. A. Piontkovsky; Edited by: A. A. Piontkovsky, P. S. Romashkin, V. M. Chkhikvadze: Nauka, 1970.
3. [Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava] Course of Soviet Criminal Law: in 6 vols. V. 2. М., 1970.
4. [Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast’. T. 1: Uchenie o prestuplenii] Criminal Law Course. General part. Vol. 1: The doctrine of crime. Textbook for Institutions of Higher Education / Under the editorship of N. F. Kuznetsova and I. M. Tyazhkova. М.: Zertsalo, 2002.
5. [Kurs ugolovnogo prava] Criminal Law Course. General part. Volume 1: The doctrine of crime. Textbook for universities. Under the editorship of N. F. Kuznetsova and I. M. Tyazhkova / G. N. Borzenkov, V. S. Komissarov, N. E. Krylova et al. IKD: Zertsalo-M, Moscow, 2002.
6. [Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo] Russian Criminal Law. Lectures: General Part: In 2 vols. V. 2 / N. S. Tagantsev; Compiler and responsible editor: N. I. Zagorodnikov. M.: Nauka, 1994. P. 223.
7. [Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Obshchaya chast’: Uchebnik] Criminal Law of Russia. General part: Textbook / Ed. by F. R. Sundurov, I. A. Tarkhanov. 2nd ed. updated and revised. M: Statut, 2016.
8. [Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast’: uchebnik] Criminal Law. General part: textbook / Rev. by I. Y. Kozachenko. 4-th ed. updated and revised. М.: Norma, 2008. P. 273.
9. Bikeev I. I., Latypova E.Yu. [Otvetstvennost’ za prestupleniya, sovershennoe s dvumya formami viny] Liability for crimes committed with two forms of guilt. Kazan: Poznaniye, 2009.
10. Burnham, William. The Legal System of the United States. 3rd ed. M.: Novaya Yustitsiya, 2006.
11. Channov S. E. [Vinovnost’ kak priznak administrativnogo pravonarusheniya] Guiltiness as a sign of an administrative offence // Grazhdanin i pravo. 2017. No. 10.
12. Dagel P. S., Mikheev R. I. [Teoreticheskie osnovy ustanovleniya viny] Theoretical Foundations of Establishing Guilt. Vladivostok: Far Eastern University Publisher, 1975.
13. Encyclopaedia of Criminal Law. Vol. 2: Criminal Law. SPb., 2005.
14. Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Philosophy. M.: Sovetskaya Encyclopaedia, 1983.
15. Feldstein G. S. [Glavnye techeniya v istorii nauki ugolovnogo prava v Rossii]
16. Main trends in the history of the science of criminal law in Russia / edited and prefaced by V. A. Tomsinov. М.: Zertsalo-M, 2003.
17. Filimonov V. D. [Problema osnovaniy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prestupnuyu nebrezhnost’] Problem of grounds of criminal responsibility for criminal negligence. M.: Centre YurInfoR, 2008.
18. Fletcher J., Naumov A.V. [Osnovnye kontseptsii sovremennogo ugolovnogo prava] Basic concepts of modern criminal law. M.: Yurist, 1998.
19. Gauchman L. D. [Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniya: zakon, teoriya, praktika] Qualification of a crime: law, theory, practice. M: AO TsentrYurInfor, 2005.
20. Idrisov H.V. [Vina kak uslovie otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave] Guilt as a Condition of Responsibility in Russian Civil Law, 2010.
21. Ivanov N. G. [Umysel v ugolovnom prave Rossii] Intent in the Criminal Law of Russia // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1995. No. 12.
22. Kerimov D. A. [Metodologiya prava. Predmet, funktsii, problem fi losofii prava] Methodology of law. Subject, Functions, Problems of Philosophy of Law. 2nd ed. М.: Avanta+, 2001.
23. Kositsina L. A. [Opredelenie viny yuridicheskogo litsa pri sovershenii im administrativnogo pravonarusheniya v oblasti tamozhennogo dela] Determination of guilt of a legal person in committing an administrative offense in the field of customs affairs // Aktual’nye voprosy publichnogo prava. 2012. No. 9.
24. Kozlov A. P. [Ponyatie prestupleniya] The concept of crime. Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy Tsentr Press, 2004.
25. Kozlov A. P. [Ponyatie prestupleniya] The concept of crime. Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy Tsentr Press, 2004.
26. Kvashis V. E. [Prestupnaya neostorozhnost’. Sotsial’no-pravovye i kriminologicheskie problemy] Criminal Negligence. Social and legal and criminological problems. Vladivostok: Far Eastern University Publisher, 1986.
27. Luneev V. V. [Sub’’ektivnoe vmenenie] Subjective imputation. M.: Spark, 2000.
28. Luneyev V.V. [Predposylki ob’’ektivnogo vmeneniya i printsip vinovnoy otvetstvennosti] Prerequisites of objective imputation and the principle of culpability // Gosudarstvo i pravo, 1992. No. 9.
29. Lyass N.V. [Normativnaya teoriya v sovremennom burzhuaznom ugolovnom prave] Normative Theory in Modern Bourgeois Criminal Law. L.: Leningrad University Press, 1963.
30. Lyass N.V. [Problemy viny i ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v sovremennykh burzhuaznykh teoriyakh] Problems of guilt and criminal responsibility in modern bourgeois theories. L.: Leningrad University Press, 1977.
31. Malkov V. P. [Sub’’ektivnye osnovaniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti] Subjective Grounds of Criminal Liability // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995. No. 1.
32. Matveev G. K. [Vina v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave] Guilt in Soviet Civil Law. Kyiv, 1955: A. M. Belyakova. [Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost’ za prichinenie vreda: Teoriya i praktika] Civil Liability for Damage: Theory and Practice. М. 1986.
33. Myasishchev V. N. [Lichnost’ i nevrozy] Personality and neuroses. L.: Leningrad University Press, 1960.Naumov A.V. [Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo] Russian Criminal Law. Course of lectures: in two volumes. Vol. 1: General part. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 2004.
34. Naumov A.V. [Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo] Russian criminal law. General Part: A Course of Lectures. М., 2000.
35. Nersesyan V. A. [Ponyatie i formy viny v ugolovnom prave] The notion and forms of guilt in criminal law // Pravovedenie. 2002. No 2.
36. Pankov I.V. [Umyshlennaya vina po rossiyskomu ugolovnomu pravu: teoreticheskiy i normativnyy analiz] Intentional guilt in Russian criminal law: theoretical and normative analysis: dissertation. Thesis. Candidate of Juridical Sciences: 12.00.08 / Ilya Vladimirovich Pankov. SPb., 2010.
37. Rarog A. I. [Nastol’naya kniga sud’I po kvalifikatsii prestupleniy] Handbook of the Judge on the Qualification of Crimes. М., 2009.
38. Rubinstein S. L. [Osnovy obshchey psikhologii] Fundamentals of General Psychology. SPb: Piter. 1999.
39. Russian Criminal Law: in 2 vols. Volume 1: General part: textbook / Edited by L.V. Inogamova-Khegay, V. S. Komissarov, A. I. Rarog. Moscow: Prospekt, 2006.
40. Shchepelkov V. F. [Kvalifikatsiya posyagatel’stv pri chastichnoy realizatsii umysla] Qualification of encroachments with partial realisation of intent // Zhurnal Rossiyskogo prava. 2002. No. 11.
41. Sklyarov V. S. [Vina i motivy prestupnogo povedeniya] Guilt and motives of criminal behaviour. SPb: Juridicheskiy Tsentr Press, 2004. P. 11.
42. Strogovich M. S. [Izbrannye Trudy: Problemy obshchey teorii prava] Selected Works: Problems of the General Theory of Law. In 3 volumes. Vol.1 M.: Nauka, 1990.
43. Trukhin A. M. [Vina kak sub’’ektivnoe osnovanie ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti] Guilt as a subjective basis for criminal responsibility. Krasnoyarsk, 1992.
44. Utevsky B. S. [Vina v sovetskom ugolovnom prave] Guilt in Soviet Criminal Law, Moscow, 1950. See also: T. L. Sergeeva. [Voprosy vinovnosti i viny v praktike Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR po ugolovnym delam] Issues of Guilt and Guilt in the Practice of the Supreme Court of the USSR in Criminal Cases. M.-L., 1950.
45. Varshava B. E., Vygotsky L. S. [Psikhologicheskiy slovar’] Psychological dictionary. SPb.: Tropa Troyanova: Roshcha Akademii, 2008.
46. Veklenko S.V. [Ponyatie, sushchnost’, soderzhanie i formy viny v ugolovnom prave] Concept, essence, content and forms of guilt in criminal law. Omsk: Publishing house of Omsk Law Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2002.
47. Veklenko S.V. [Vinovnoe vmenenie v ugolovnom prave] Guilty imputation in criminal law. Thesis of the Doctor of Juridical Science. Omsk, 2003.
48. Yakuba O. M. [O priznakakh administrativnogo pravonarusheniya] On the signs of an administrative offence // Pravovedenie. 1964. No. 3.
49. Yakushin V. A. [Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy. Obshchie voprosy] Qualification of crimes. General issues. Togliatti: VUiT, 2016.
50. Yakushin V. A. [Oshibka i eyo ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie] Mistake and its criminal law significance. Kazan University Press, 1988.
51. Yakushin V. A. [Sub’’ektivnoe vmenenie i ego znachenie v ugolovnom prave] Subjective imputation and its significance in criminal law. Togliatti: TolPI, 1988.
52. Yurchak E.V. [Vina kak obshchepravovoy institut] Guilt as a General Legal Institution. Thesis. Candidate of Juridical Sciences. М., 2016.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
, , . Kazan University Law Review. 2020;5(3):179-202. https://doi.org/10.31085/2310-8681-2020-5-281-179-202
For citation:
Rarog A.I., Tarhanov A.I., Gayfutdinov R.R. The main concepts of guilt and the particularities of their representation in Russian criminal law. Kazan University Law Review. 2020;5(3):179-202. https://doi.org/10.31085/2310-8681-2020-5-281-179-202
Просмотров:
74
Послать статью по эл. почте 