Discretionary Justice Development. Mindfulness. Quantum theory
https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2021-6-1-24-66
Abstract
As a result of a very little body of academic research on the influence of judicial discretion on civil justice, there is the question if judicial discretion should be an important component of civil justice reforms. The question is crucial, as there are still many forces against discretionary justice and little attention to comprehensive study the phenomenon of judicial discretion. The paper provides answers three questions: Why discretionary justice? Why the development of comparatve discretionary justice? Why through mindfulness and quantum theory? We pay attention on interconnections of problems of different branches of law and on an interdisciplinary context. This article is designed to explore the problem of discretionary justice in a new and innovative way. We intend to create a space of reflection and communication where salient questions of discretionary justice and its context(s) can be re-negotiated from a variety of disciplinary perspectives, and re-connected with other disciplins. It is designed to enhance a re-location of the essay of discretionary justice among other sciences and can thus allow to develop innovative research agendas in multidisciplinary constellations beyond just a legal focus. Here we use , inter alia, “The judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the civil procedure of the Russian Federation” of A.R. Sultanov,“Helgoland” of Italian physicist Carlo Rovelli, coming out in September 2020
About the Author
O Papkova
University of Pavia
Italy
Italy
Olga Papkova (Pavia, Italy) — Candidate of Legal Sciences
69, Gorizia viale, Pavia, 27100, Italy
References
1. Abushenko D. Sudebnoe Usmotrenie v grazhdanskom I arbitrazhnom processe (Judicial Discretion in Civil and Arbitrazh Proceedings), 6 (1999), The Ruling of the Constitutional Court of Russia on January 25, No. 1. P. 2001.
2. Alastair I.M. Rae, Quantum Physics, Second Edition: Illusion or Reality? Cambridge University Press. 2012.
3. Baglay V.M. Vstupitel`nay stat`y k: Barak A. Sudeyskoe usmotrenie (Introduction to: Barak A. Judicial Discretion). Moscva, 1999.
4. Baksa P. Faith Wave I Think… Therefore It Is.., Intelegance Publishing. 2014. Barak A. Sudeyskoe usmotrenie (Judicial Discretion). Moscva, 1999.
5. Bingham Tom. The Business of Judging. Selected Essays and Speeches. 2000.
6. Bohm David. Causality and Chance in Modern Physics. London Taylor and Francis (2005), Miguel Espinoza,Théorie du déterminisme causal, L’Harmattan, Paris. 2006.
7. Bonner A. Primenenie Normativnykh aktov v grazhdanskom processe. (Application of Legal Acts in Civil Procedure), Moscva. 1980.
8. Bozzi Ida. “Helgoland” di Carlo Rovelli, l’isola e gli amici geniali: la fisica dei ventenni”. Corriere della Sera. September 2 2020.
9. Bunge Mario. Causality: the place of the causal principle in modern science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1959.
10. Danilenko G.M. Implementation of International Law in CIS States: Theory and Practice, European Journal of International Law 10:1, 1999.
11. De Cruz P. Comparative Law in a Changing World, London: Cavendish Publishing. 1999.
12. Drozdov I. Sudejskoe usmotrenie — kraeugolnii kamen` sudejskoj rabotii (Judicial Discretion is the cornerstone of a judge`s job), Zakon №1, 2010.
13. Gabor D. Inventing the Future, Penguin Books. 1964.
14. Garfield Jay L. Dependent Arising and the Emptiness of Emptiness: Why Did Nāgārjuna Start with Causation?, Philosophy East and West. 44 (2): 219–50. April 1994.
15. Garfield Jay L. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1995.
16. Ginsburgs George. Objective Truth and the Judicial Process in Post-Stalinist Soviet Jurisprudence, Oxford University Press, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 10, No. 1/2, Winter — Spring, 1961.
17. Green Celia. The Lost Cause: Causation and the Mind–Body Problem, Oxford: Oxford Forum. 2003.
18. Harding A. Global Doctrine and Local Knowledge: Law in South East Asia. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, (51). 2002.
19. Inchausti Fernando Gascon, Hess Burkhard (eds). The Future of the European Law on Civil Procedure. 2020.
20. Kanashevskii V.A. Precedentnaya Praktika Evropeyskogo Suda po Pravam Cheloveka kak Regulyator Grazhdanskix Otnoshenii v Rossiiskoy Federatii (Precedents of ECtHR as the regulator of civil relationship in RF), Zhurnal Rossiiskogo Prava, 4, 2003.
21. Khare Ghose, Archana. The retell market, The Times of India. 2011.
22. Koni A.F. Izbrannye trudi e rechi (Selected works and speeches), Yurayt. 2019.
23. Mälksoo L. Introduction. Russia, Strasbourg, and the Paradox of a Human Rights Backlash. In Mälksoo L., Benedek W. (eds.) Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2017.
24. Marchenko M.N.Uridicheskaya priroda I harakter reshenii Evropeyskogo Suda po Pravam Cheloveka (Legal Nature of the Rulings of EctHR), Gosudarstvo I Pravo, 2, 2006.
25. Nikolaev A. M., Davtyan M. K. Ispolnenie reshenij Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka i Mezhameri-kanskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka: sravnitel’nyj analiz (Compliance with the ECtHR and Inter-American Court of Human Rights decisions: a comparative study), Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya, 4: 2018.
26. Panova I. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyi protsess. (The Administrative Jurisdictional Process), Saratov (1998), Gosudarstvo i pravo,10. 1999.
27. Papkova O.A. Usmotrenie Suda (Judicial Discretion). Moscva, 2005.
28. Pastukhov V. Chto lyudyam ne nravitsya v rossiiskom pravosudii? (What do persons not like in the Russian Justice?). Rossiiskaya Yustitsiya (The Russian Justice ). No. 8, 1998.
29. Pravoprimenenie v Sovetskom Gosudarstve (Law Application in Soviet State).Moscva, 1985.
30. Rassahatskaya N. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya grazhdanskogo processualnogo zakona (The Problems of Civil Predure Law’s Improvement), Tver, 2000.
31. Roeben Volker. Judicial Protection as the Meta-norm in the EU Judicial Architecture, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, volume 12, 2020.
32. Shailini George. The Cure for the Distracted Mind: Why Law Schools Should Teach Mindfulness, 53 Du-quesne L. Rev. 215. 2015.
33. Shakaryan M. Prinimat li novyi GPK ili podpravlyat staryi? (Is it Necessary to Adopt a New CCP or to Amend the Existent One?) Rossiiskaya Yustitsiya, 2, 1999.
34. Siddiqui Shabnam, Singh Chandralekha. How diverse are physics instructors’ attitudes and approaches to teaching undergraduate level quantum mechanics? European Journal of Physics, 38 (3). 2017.
35. Squires Euan J. The Mystery of the Quantum World. Taylor & Francis Group. 1994.
36. Starilov Yu.N. O sushchnosti i novoy sisteme administrativnogo prava: nekotoryye itogi diskussii. (The Essence of the New System of the Administrative Law: Certain Results of the Discussion). Gosudarstvo i pravo, 5, 2000.
37. Starykh U.V. Usmotrenie v nalogovom pravoprimenenii (Discretion in tax law application). Moscva, 2007.
38. Sultanov A.R. Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, Statut, 2020.
39. Valeev D., Baranov S. The reform of the civil procedural legislation: world trends, Life Science Journal, 11(12s). 2014.
40. Vaskovskiy E. Rukovodstvo k tolkovaniu I primeneniu zakonov (prakticheskoe posobie) (Guide to Interpretation and Application of the Laws (Text-book), Moscva, 1997.
41. Vikut M.A, Zaitsev I.M. Grazhdanskii protsess Rossii (The Civil Procedure of Russia). Text-book, Moscow, 1999.
42. Wimmel Hermann. Quantum Physics & Observed Reality: A Critical Interpretation of Quantum Mechan-ics. World Scientific, 2. 1998.
43. Zimmermann Reinhard. Roman Law, Contemporary Law, European Law: The Civilian Tradition Today, Oxford University Press. 2001.
44. Zorkin V.D. Konstituzionnyii Sud Rossii v Evropeyskom pravovom pole (The Constitutional Court of Russia in European legal field). Zurnal Rossiiskogo prava, 3, 2005.
Review
For citations:
Papkova O. Discretionary Justice Development. Mindfulness. Quantum theory. Kazan University Law Review. 2021;6(1):24-66. https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2021-6-1-24-66
Views:
19
Email this article 