Preview

Kazan University Law Review

Advanced search

Genesis of the inter-branch individual safety institute in the russian criminal legal proceedings

https://doi.org/10.31085/2541-8823-2020-5-1-40-51

Abstract

The safety of witnesses, victims and other participants in the criminal process correlates with increasing effectiveness of evidence and protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the participants. To study the laws of development and establishment of the institution of personal security, it is relevant to identify new vectors for the development of criminal proceedings and eliminate existing intersectoral contradictions. It is also essential to compare respective Russian legal acts with the international standards.

The main issue of criminal proceedings correlates with proving person guilty or innocent of in the incriminated event. is complex process is diverse and unpredictable, since the collection of sufficient evidence for a criminal case (Article 73 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation) can be hindered by an unlawful act preventing crimes’ detection, impeding the investigation and the offender’sevasion from criminal punishment. By providing substantial evidence, the parties to criminal proceedings face risks a priori. For these reasons, ensuring the security of an individual in criminal proceedings correlates with its purpose, principles and tasks. It also implements the constitutional priorities and security of an individual (rights, freedoms and legitimate interests).

About the Authors

A. Epikhin
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Russian Federation

Alexander Epikhin - Doctor of Legal Science, Professor of the Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

18, Kremlyvskaya St., 420008, Kazan



O. Zaitsev
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Oleg Zaitsev – Doctor of Legal Science, Professor of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

82, Vernadsky Avenue, 119571, Moscow, building 1



A. Mishin
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Russian Federation

Andrei Mishin – Candidate of Legal Science, Associate Professor of the Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

18, Kremlyvskaya St., 420008, Kazan



References

1. Armenov V. Yu., Vlasov I. S., Golovanova N. A. Legal protection of the victim in a foreign country: monography / V. Yu. Armenov, I. S. Vlasov, N. A. Golovanova [et al.]; Editor-in-chief of S. P. Kubantsev, M.: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation: INFRA-M, 2017.

2. Brusnitsyn L. V.Theoretical and legal foundations and world experience in ensuring the safety of persons contributing to criminal justice (Moscow, 2002).

3. Dmitrieva A. A. A theoretical model for the safe participation of individuals in Russian criminal proceedings (Moscow 2016).

4. Dmitrieva A. A. On the content of the theoretical model of the safe participation of individuals in Russian criminal proceedings // Bulletin of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia: a scientific and practical journal. 2017. No. 1.

5. Dmitrieva A. A.Prerequisites for the modernization of the process of safe participation of an individual in the modern Russian criminal process // Society and Law: a scientific and practical journal. 2017. No. 1.

6. Dmitrieva A. A. Security measures applied to participants in the process at the stage of preliminary investigation of a criminal case // Russian investigator. 2017. No. 1.

7. Epihin A. Yurevich, Gataullin Z. Shakirovich, Zaitsev O. Aleksandrovich, Grishina E. Pavlovna & Mishin A. Viktorovich CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OF TERRORIST CRIMES IN JURY TRIAL: LEGALITY AND APPROPRIATENESS // Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,7(5) (2019).

8. Epihin A. Yurevich, Zaitsev O.Aleksandrovich, Grishina E. Pavlovna, MishinA. Viktorovich, & Aliyeva G. Isaevna, ANTI-CORRUPTION CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LEGISLATION OF RUSSIA // Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5) (2019).

9. Epihin Alexander Yurevich, Oleg Aleksandrovich, Z., Ekaterina Pavlovna, G., Andrey Viktorovich, M., & Gulnar Isaevna, A. INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PROTECTION OF JUVENILE VICTIMS (CHILD VICTIMS) FROM CRIME // Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5) (2019).

10. Epikhin A. Yu. Ensuring the safety of persons contributing to criminal proceedings: textbook. allowance (Kazan, 2018).

11. Epikhin A. Yu. The concept of personal security in criminal proceedings (Syktyvkar, 2004).

12. Epikhin, A. THE SUBJECT MATTER OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE RELATING TO THE DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ON SECURITY MEASURES APPLICABLE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OR CONTROL OFFICIAL / Epikhin, A., Zaytsev, O. // Internal Security. 2018. Volume 10. Issue 1.

13. Epikhin, A. Y. et al. Protection by the government and security support for the parties of modern criminal process in Russia: Problems and perspectives, Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues Volume 19, Special Issue, 2016.

14. Epikhin, A. Y. et al. Protection of the Witnesses and Victims: International Legal Acts, Legislation of some States and the Modern Russian Legislation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. 313–322, may 2016.

15. Felföldi Enikö. The rising importance on the protection of witnesses in the European Union // Revue Internationale de droit penal. 2006. No. 77. Pp. 313–322.

16. Kaats M. E. Institute of Criminal Procedure Security Measures (Ufa, 2016). Markus Eikel. Witness Protection Measures at the International Criminal Court:

17. Legal Framework and Emerging Practice // Criminal Law Forum. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 97–133.

18. Monica Semrad, ea Vanags, Navjot Bhullar. Selecting witness protection officers: developing atest battery for Australian police // Police Practice and Research. 2014. No.1. P. 6–16.

19. Naduev M. N. To the question of the mechanism for the implementation of interrogation under apseudonym during criminal proceedings available at http://pravmisl.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1857.

20. Pamela E. Hart. Falling Through the Cracks: The Shortcomings of Victim and Witness Protection Under § 1512 of the Federal Victim and Witness Protection Act// Valparaiso University Law Review. 2009. No. 2.

21. Rezana Balla. Witnesses protection in fighting organised crime // European Scientific Journal. Available at http://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view-File/550/623.

22. Zaytsev O. A. Theoretical and legal fundamentals of the state protection of participants of criminal procedure (Moscow, 1999).


Review

For citations:


Epikhin A., Zaitsev O., Mishin A. Genesis of the inter-branch individual safety institute in the russian criminal legal proceedings. Kazan University Law Review. 2020;5(1):40-51. https://doi.org/10.31085/2541-8823-2020-5-1-40-51

Views: 24


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8823 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7885 (Online)