Towards Green and Eco-Efficient Regulatory Sandboxes: Challenges and Prospe
https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2026-11-68-86
Abstract
The gradual virtualization of society, driven by rapid digitalization, creates the misconception that digital processes reduce environmental pollution. In reality, the environmental impact of developing and deploying digital innovations often exceeds that of traditional industrial production. At the same time, states are increasingly promoting technological innovation through experimental legal regimes, such as regulatory sandboxes. A review of international experiences shows that “green” sandboxes are being established in several jurisdictions; however, little attention has been given to designing environmentally efficient sandbox frameworks. This article introduces the concept of environmental effectiveness in experimental legal regimes for digital innovation. It examines green sandbox initiatives in Austria, Vietnam, the USA, and Canada, and develops criteria for evaluating eco-efficiency in legal experimentation. The research applies case analysis, comparative legal methods, a systemic approach, and legal modeling to design a scalable framework for eco-efficient sandboxes. The proposed model embeds circular economy principles–such as resource efficiency, lifecycle thinking, and sustainability-into regulatory innovation. By integrating environmental and legal performance criteria, this approach offers policymakers and regulators a practical tool for fostering sustainable technological development.
About the Authors
Elizaveta GromovaRussian Federation
Elizaveta Gromova — Ph.D. (Law), Associate Professor, Deputy Director of the Law Institute on International Activity, Associate Professor at the Department of Entrepreneurial, Competition and Environmental Law
Chelyabinsk
Daniel Brantes Ferreira
Brazil
Daniel Brantes Ferreira — Ph.D., Senior Researcher, National Research; Professor; CEO
Russia; USA; Rio de Janeiro
References
1. Alaassar A., Mention A., Aas T. H. Exploring a new incubation model for FinTechs: Regulatory sandboxes // Technovation. 2021. Vol. 103. P. 102237. (In English)
2. Allen H. J. Regulatory sandboxes // George Washington Law Review. 2019. Vol. 87. P. 34–41. (In English)
3. BRICS. XVI Summit Kazan Declaration: Strengthening multilateralism for just global development and security // Kazan (Russian Federation). 23 Oct 2024. Available at: http://static.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/en/RosOySvLzGaJtmx2wYFv0lN4NSPZploG.pdf. Accessed 15 Jul 2025. (In English)
4. Castro D. Rethinking concerns about AI’s energy use // Center for Data Innovation. Washington (DC). January 2024. Available at: https://www2.datainnovation.org/2024-ai-energy-use.pdf. Accessed 15 Jul 2025. (In English)
5. Crampes C., Estache A. Efficiency vs. equity concerns in regulatory sandboxes // TSE Working Paper. 2023. № 23. P. 1466. (In English)
6. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. How the circular economy tackles climate change // Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Cowes (UK). 2019. (In English) European Commission. A new circular economy action plan: For a cleaner and more competitive Europe // Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the
7. European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM (2020) 98 final. Brussels. 2020. (In English)
8. Fenwick M., Van Uytsel S., Ying B. Regulating FinTech in Asia: Global context, local perspectives // Springer. Singapore. 2021. (In English)
9. Financial Conduct Authority. Regulatory sandbox // FCA. London. 2022. Available at: https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/innovation/regulatory-sandbox. Accessed 15 Jul 2025. (In English)
10. Firmansyah M. L., Rizki I. N., Ullah N. Recent advances in urban mining technology: A focus on electronic waste recycling potential in Indonesia // Cleaner Waste Systems. 2025. Vol. 10. P. 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100239. (In English)
11. Global Regulatory Sandbox Review. An overview on the impact, challenges, and benefits of regulatory FinTech sandboxes // 2017. Available at: https://financedocbox.com/Insurance/73322297-Global-regulatory-sandbox-review.html. Accessed 15 Jul 2025. (In English)
12. Gromova E. Evaluating the effectiveness of models of incentive legal regimes of entrepreneurial activity in the sphere of digital innovations and technologies // Pravoprimenenie. 2023. № 4. P. 69–73. (In English)
13. Gromova E., Ivanc T. Regulatory sandboxes (experimental legal regimes) for digital innovations in BRICS // BRICS Law Journal. 2020. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 10–36. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-2-10-36. (In English)
14. Higgins P., Male T. Sandboxing nature: How regulatory sandboxes could help restore species, enhance water quality and build better habitats faster // Environmental Policy Innovation Center. Washington (DC). 2019. (In English)
15. International Civil Aviation Organization. Blockchain sandbox // ICAO. Montréal. [cited 2025 Jul 15]. Available from: https://www.icao.int/blockchainsandbox. (In English)
16. Kim E. J. China’s green special economic zone policies — Development and implementation // Global Green Growth Institute. Seoul (Korea). 2017. (In English)
17. Kirchherr J., Reike D., Hekkert M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions // Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2017. Vol. 127. P. 221–232. (In English)
18. Korolev V., Mitrofanov A. The carbon footprint of predicting CO2 storage capacity in metal-organic frameworks within neural networks // iScience. 2024. Vol. 27. № 5. P. 109644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.109644. (In English)
19. Liang Z., Zhang M., Mao Q., Yu B., Ma B. Improvement of eco-efficiency in China: A comparison of mandatory and hybrid environmental policy instruments // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018. Vol. 15. № 7. P. 1473–1482. (In English)
20. Maass M. A systematic analysis of the science of sandboxing // PeerJ Computer Science. 2016. Vol. 2. P. e43. (In English)
21. Mnuchin S. T., Phillips C. S. A financial system that creates economic opportunities: Nonbank financials, fintech, and innovation // U. S. Department of the Treasury. Washington (DC). 2018. Available at: https://home.treasury.gov/sites/default/files/2018-08/A-Financial-System-that-Creates-EconomicOpportunities-Nonbank-Financials-Fintech-and-Innovation.pdf. Accessed 15 Jul 2025. (In English)
22. OECD. Regulatory sandboxes in artificial intelligence // OECD Digital Economy Paper No. 356. OECD. Paris. July 2023. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/07/regulatorysandboxes-in-artificial-intelligence_a44aae4f/8f80a0e6-en.pdf. Accessed 15 Jul 2025. (In English)
23. Patil R. A., Ramakrishna S. A. Comprehensive analysis of e-waste legislation worldwide // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020. Vol. 27. P. 14412–14431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07992-1. (In English)
24. Poncibo C., Zoboli L. Sandboxes and consumer protection: the European perspective // International Journal on Consumer Law and Practice. 2020. Vol. 2. № 8. P. 1–22. (In English)
25. Smith J. The impact of EU legislation in the area of digital and green transition, particularly on SMEs // European Parliament. Brussels. November 2024. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses. Accessed 15 Jul 2025. (In English)
26. Stern A. Innovation under regulatory uncertainty: Evidence from medical technology // Journal of Public Economics. 2017. Vol. 147. P. 181. (In English)
27. United Nations Secretary-General’s Task Force on Digital Financing of the Sustainable Development Goals. People’s money: Harnessing digitalization to finance a sustainable future // United Nations. New York. 2020. Available at: https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/DF-Task-Force-Full-Report-Aug-2020-1. pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2025. (In English)
28. Vitório P. W., Pessoa R. L. P. L., Simões-Borgiani D. S. Regulatory sandbox as an alternative to insert the disruptive innovations developed by startups in Brazil // International Journal for Innovation Education and Research. 2021. Vol. 9. № 9. P. 555–562. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss9.3395. (In English)
Review
For citations:
Gromova E., Ferreira D.B. Towards Green and Eco-Efficient Regulatory Sandboxes: Challenges and Prospe. Kazan University Law Review. 2026;11(2):68-86. https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2026-11-68-86
JATS XML



















