Overcoming conflicts of criminal jurisdiction of EU member states and the practice of applying the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions
https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2019-4-1-6-23
Abstract
The article is devoted to the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions and overcoming conflicts of criminal jurisdiction of the EU member states. The union was created in 1977 and the states got together to overcome economic and other important issues of development. Moreover, the growth of terrorism clearly showed that the internal security of the EU member states should be ensured not only through measures taken at the national level. Certainly the existing diversity of legal systems of the EU countries, together with the European guarantees of freedom of movement, have inevitably led to a clash and conflict of criminal jurisdiction of the EU member states. The author analyses the steps and documents of the process of implementing the internal security (the Green Paper on Conflicts of Jurisdiction and the Principle of ne bis in idem in Criminal Proceedings, agreements and protocols) and also the latest tools for mutual recognition.
About the Author
A. Kayumova
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alfiya Kayumova, Professor, Doctor of Legal Sciences
Law Faculty; Department of International and European Law
420008; 18 Kremlyovskaya St.; Kazan
References
1. Askerov Z.A., Safarov N.A. The principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions as the fundamental basis of the system of criminal law cooperation of the member states of the European Union, News of universities. Jurisprudence. 2011, no 4, https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17299939&ysclid=lx1fs1cz9r9503563
2. Asp P. Mutual Recognition and the Development of Criminal Law Cooperation Within the EU, Harmonization of Criminal Law in Europe, еd. by E.J. Husabo, A. Strand-bakken, p. 23.
3. Banach-Gutierrez J.B. Globalized criminal justice in the European Union context: how theory meets practice, New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2013, vol. 4, issue 1–2, p. 154–159, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315059625_Globalised_Criminal_Justice_in_the_European_Union_Context_How_Theory_Meets_Practice
4. Biryukov P.N. On the problems of applying in the EU the “Structural Solution on the European arrest warrant“, International legal readings, ed. P.N. Biryukov. Voronezh, 2006, vol. 5. p. 143–145.
5. Biryukov P.N. European Evidence Order, Russian Law Journal, 2010, no 1, p. 34–40.
6. Craig P., de Búrca G. EU Law, Text, Cases, and Materials. 5<sup>th</sup> ed. OUP, Oxford, 2011, p. 332–333.
7. Grabbe H. Internal Security of the European Union: Laying a New Foundation, Europe after September 11, 2001. Moscow, 2002, p. 106.
8. Elsen C. From Maastricht to the Hague: the Politics of Judicial and Police Cooperation, Era Forum, 2007, no 8, p. 13–26.
9. John A.E. Vervaele, European Criminal Law and General Principles of Union Law, Research Papers in Law 5/2005, College of Europe, European Legal Studies, p. 5–6, https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/217146
10. Klip A. European Criminal Law, Ius Communitatis II, Intersentia, Antwerp, 2009, p. 318–324.
11. Ligeti К. Mutual recognition of financial penalties in the European Union, Revue internationale de droit penal, 2006/1, vol. 77, https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-droit-penal-2006-1-page-145.htm
12. Milinchuk V.V. New international cooperation in the field of criminal procedure: the concept of transnational justice, State and law, 2004, no 1, p. 90.
13. Mitsilegas V. Trust-building Measures in the European Judicial Area in Criminal Matters: Issues of Competence, Legitimacy and Inter-institutional Balance, Security versus Freedom: a Challenge for Europe’s Future. Ashgate Publishing, 2006, p. 280.
14. Mitsilegas V. EU Criminal Law. Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 2009, p. 101.
15. Nuotio K. On the Signifi cance of Criminal Law Justice for Europe, Europe in Search of ‘Meaning and Purpose’, Publications of Faculty of Law. Helsinki, 2004, pp. 173, 210.
16. Panayides P. Conflicts of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings : analysis and possible improvements to the EU legal framework, Revue internationale de droit penal. 2006/1, vol. 77, p. 113–119.
17. Panyushkina O.V. On the mutual recognition of sentences with a view to the execution of sentences between the Member States of the European Union, Bulletin of Voronezh State University, Series “Law”, 2010, no 1, p. 525.
18. Peers S. Mutual Recognition and Criminal Law in the European Union: Has the Council Got it Wrong, Common Market Law Review. 2004, vol. 41, no 1, p. 5–36.
19. Plachta M. European Arrest Warrant: Revolution in Extradition, International Criminal Law Review, 2003, vol. 11, no 2, p. 186–187.
20. Shamsutdinova R.R. The space of freedom, security and justice of the European Union: the formation, development and main forms of cooperation of the Member States: Diss. ... Cand. legal sciences. Kazan: Kazan State University, 2009, p. 9.
21. Smeulers А. The position of the individual in international criminal cooperation, European Evidence Warrant: Transnational Judicial Inquires in the EU. J.A.E. Vervaele (eds.). Intersentia, Antwerp, 2005, p. 92–102.
22. Strandbakken A. The Nordic Answer to the European Arrest Warrant: The Nordic Arrest Warrant, Eucrim 3–4/2007, p. 139–140.
23. Tolttila K. The Nordic Arrest Warrant: What Makes for Even Higher Mutual Trust?, NJECL (2011) 4, p.368.
24. Vermeulen G. Approximation and Mutual recognition of Procedural safeguards of Suspects and Defendants in Criminal proceedings throughout the European Union, EU and International Crime Control: Topical Issues, еd. by M. Cools, B. de Ruyver and others. Antwerpen: Maklu, 2010, p. 47.
25. Vervaele J.A.E. The transnational ne bis in idem principle in the EU: Mutual recognition and equivalent protection of human rights, Utrecht Law Review. 2005, vol. 1(2), p. 107.
26. Zinn A. Overcoming conflicts of criminal jurisdiction in the European Union: the present and the future, Eurasian advocacy, 2013, no 6 (7), http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/preodolenie-konfliktov-ugolovnoy-yurisdiktsii-v-evropeyskom-soyuze-nastoyaschee-i-buduschee.
Review
For citations:
Kayumova A. Overcoming conflicts of criminal jurisdiction of EU member states and the practice of applying the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions. Kazan University Law Review. 2019;4(1):6-23. https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2019-4-1-6-23
Views:
81
Email this article 