The issues of limitation of actions in cases of bringing to subsidiary liability
https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2025-10-1-25-33
Аннотация
The article studies general positions on limitation periods and peculiarities of their application in isolated disputes on bringing the persons controlling the debtor to subsidiary liability within the framework of cases on insolvency (bankruptcy) of legal entities. The article considers subjective and objective limitation periods, their specifics, as well as grounds and conditions for restoration of missed periods. Special attention is paid to the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Problematic aspects of the application of different versions of bankruptcy legislation in time and the influence of actual circumstances on the beginning of the limitation period are analyzed. It is concluded that the current regulation of the institute of limitation in bankruptcy cases is generally effective, but a number of issues related to the transitional provisions of the legislation remain discussable.
Список литературы
1. Altukhov A. V., Levichev S. V. Protsessualnye osobennosti rassmotreniya zayavleniy o privlechenii kontroliruyushchikh dolzhnika lits k subsidiarnoy otvetstvennosti pri bankrotstve [Procedural peculiarities of consideration of applications for bringing persons controlling the debtor to subsidiary liability in bankruptcy proceedings] // Sudya [Judge]. 2018. No. 4. Pp. 27–32. (In Russian)
2. Bykov V. P., Chernikova E. V., Markelova I. V. Privlechenie kontroliruyushchikh dolzhnika lits k subsidiarnoy otvetstvennosti za nepodachu (nesvoevremennuyu podachu) zayavleniya o bankrotstve dolzhnika [Involvement of persons controlling the debtor in subsidiary liability for failure to file (late filing) a bankruptcy petition of the debtor] // Sovremennoe pravo [Modern Law]. 2018. No. 7–8. Pp. 61–68. (In Russian)
3. Dobrachev D. V. Problemy sudebnoy praktiki privlecheniya k subsidiarnoy otvetstvennosti kontroliruyushchikh dolzhnika lits v protsedure bankrotstva [Issues of judicial practice of bringing debtor’s controlling persons to subsidiary liability in bankruptcy proceedings]. M.: Infotropik Media, 2019. 172 p. (In Russian)
4. Garbashev I. V. O nekotorykh materialno-pravovykh aspektakh privlecheniya k subsidiarnoy otvetstvennosti v razyasneniyakh VS RF [On certain substantive legal aspects of bringing to subsidiary liability in the clarifications of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation] // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [The Bulletin of Civil Law]. 2018. No. 4. Pp. 154–202. (In Russian)
5. Kirillova M. Ya. Iskovaya davnost [Limitation of action] // Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil Law] / Pod obshch. red. T. I. Illarionovoy, B. M. Gongalo, V. A. Pletneva. M., 2001. 257 p. (In Russian)
6. Kirillova M. Ya., Krasheninnikov P. V. Sroki. Iskovaya davnost [Statute of Limitations. Limitation of action] // Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil Law] / Pod red. red. B. M. Gongalo. M., 2016. 80 p. (In Russian)
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
. Kazan University Law Review. 2025;10(1):25-33. https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2025-10-1-25-33
For citation:
Lukin Yu. The issues of limitation of actions in cases of bringing to subsidiary liability. Kazan University Law Review. 2025;10(1):25-33. https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2025-10-1-25-33
Просмотров:
20
Послать статью по эл. почте 