Compensatory ways to protect civil rights in Russia
https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2023-8-1-5-16
Abstract
Th e article is devoted to the analysis of the legal regulation of ways to protect civil rights aimed at loss compensation. Th e subject of the study are the usage peculiarities of such methods as recovery of losses, compensation for non-pecuniary damage and recovery of penalties. We attempted to conduct the analysis of the existing judicial practice concerning the above-specified questions. Th e generalization of the most frequently encountered issues in the resolution of such disputes is also given in this article. Summing up the results of the analysis we have drawn the conclusion that it is necessary to consolidate certain legal norms designed to establish a uniform approach.
About the Author
D. N. LatypovRussian Federation
Denis Latypov (Perm, Russia) — Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Business Law
15 Bukireva St., Perm, 614990
References
1. Artemenko M. S. Rol neustoyki v obespechenii ispolneniya planovo-dogovornykh obyazatelstv v novykh usloviyakh khozyaystvovaniya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. [The role of forfeit in ensuring the fulfillment of planned-contractual obligations in the new conditions of economic management: autoreferat of the dissertation of Candidate of Legal Sciences] — M. — 1986. — 32 p. (In Russian)
2. Bykov A. G. Rol grazhdansko-pravovykh sanktsiy v osushchestvlenii khozyaystvennogo rascheta: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. [The role of civil law sanctions in the implementation of economic settlement: autoreferat of dissertation of the Candidate of Legal Sciences] — M. — 1967. — 25 p. (In Russian)
3. Dzhenks E. Angliyskoe pravo [The English law] / per. L. A. Luntsa. — M.: Gosyurizdat. — 1947. — 489 p. (In Russian)
4. Eliseev N. G. Mnogokratnye ubytki za narushenie antimonopolnogo zakonodatelstva: perspektivy poyavleniya v rossiyskom prave [Multiple damages for violation of antitrust law: prospects for appearance in Russian law] // Vestnik VAS RF [Herald of the Supreme Arbitration Court]. — 2013. — No. 8. — Pp. 4–15. (In Russian)
5. Godes A. B. Voprosy materialnoy otvetstvennosti gosudarstvennykh predpriyatiy i organizatsiy v usloviyakh novoy sistemy planirovaniya i ekonomicheskogo stimulirovaniya [The issues of material responsibility of state enterprises and organizations under the new system of planning and economic incentives] // Voprosy Grazhdanskogo prava i protsessa [Issues of Civil Law and Procedure]. — L.: Izd-vo LGU. — 1969. — Pp. 112–116. (In Russian)
6. Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil Law] T. 1 / pod red. A. P. Sergeeva, Yu. K. Tolstogo. — M. — 2001. — 848 p. (In Russian)
7. Gushchin D. I. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost za moralnyy vred [Legal liability for moral damages]. — SPb. — 2002. — 166 p. (In Russian)
8. Ioff e O. S. Plan i organizatsiya dogovornykh svyazey v sotsialisticheskom narodnom khozyaystve [Plan and organization of contractual relations in the socialist national economy] // Uchenye zapiski [Scientifi c Notes]. — Vyp. 10. — M.: VNIISZ. — 1967. — Pp. 3–177. (In Russian)
9. Kazantsev V. I. Grazhdansko-pravovye sposoby obespecheniya ispolneniya obyazatelstv [Civil law methods of securing obligations] // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Russian laws: experience, analysis, practice]. — 2006. — No. 12. — Pp. 63–77. (In Russian)
10. Khokhlov V. A. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost za narushenie dogovora: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. [Civil liability for breach of contract: dissertation of the Doctor of Juridical Sciences] — Samara. — 1998. — 349 p. (In Russian)
11. Khokhlov V. A. Obshchie polozheniya ob obyazatelstvakh: Uchebnoe posobie [The general provisions on obligations: Textbook]. — M.: Statut. — 2015. — Pp. 287–288. (In Russian)
12. Koloteva V. G. Primenenie zakonodatelstva o kompensatsii moralnogo vreda v rossiyskoy sudebnoy praktike. Problemy opredeleniya razmera kompensatsii moralnogo vreda [Application of the law on compensation for moral damage in Russian judicial practice. Problems of determining the amount of compensation for moral damage] // Pravo i politika [Law and Politics]. — 2007. — No. 8. — Pp. 82–91. (In Russian)
13. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu RSFSR [The Commentary to the Civil Code of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic] / Otv. red. S. N. Bratus, O. N. Sadikov. — M.: Yuridicheskaya literature. — 1982. — 680 p. (In Russian)
14. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti pervoy (postateynyy) [Commentary to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part One (article-by-article)] / pod red. T. E. Abovoy, A. Yu. Kabalkina. M., 2004. 926 p. (In Russian)
15. Kostyuk V. Obespechenie ispolneniya obyazatelstv [Ensuring performance of obligations ] // Khozyaystvo i pravo [Economy and Law]. — 2003. — No. 3. (Prilozhenie). (In Russian)
16. Krol M. S. Vozmeshchenie ubytkov v kapitalnom stroitelstve [Compensation for losses in capital construction]. — Donetsk. — 1972. — 205 p. (In Russian)
17. Lomidze O. G., Lomidze E. Yu. Obyazatelstvo iz neosnovatelnogo obogashcheniya pri nedostizhenii storonoy dogovora svoey tseli [Obligation from unjust enrichment when a party to a contract fails to achieve its objective] // Vestnik VAS RF [Herald of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation]. — 2006. — No. 7. — Pp. 24–35. (In Russian)
18. Monastyrskiy Yu. E. Ubytki i nematerialnyy vred [Losses and non-pecuniary damages] // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Herald of Civil Law]. — 2019. — No. 2. — Pp. 113–132. (In Russian)
19. Novoselova L. A. Printsip spravedlivosti i mekhanizm kompensatsii kak sredstvo zashchity isklyuchitelnykh prav [Th e principle of justice and compensation mechanism as a means of protecting exclusive rights] // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Herald of Civil Law]. — 2017. — No. 2. — Pp. 48–55. (In Russian)
20. Pinding A. Ya. Vozmeshchenie ubytkov, prichinennykh promyshlennym predpriyatiyam neispolneniem dogovornykh obyazatelstv: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. [Compensation for losses caused to industrial enterprises by nonfulfi llment of contractual obligations: autoreferat of dissertation of the Candidate of Legal Sciences.] — M. — 1968. — 18 p. (In Russian)
21. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik [Soviet Civil Law: Textbook]. T. 1 / pod red. O. A. Krasavchikova. — M. — 1985. — 544 p. (In Russian)
22. Travkin A. A. Neustoyka v sovetskom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. [The forfeitin the Soviet Law: autoreferat of dissertation of the Candidate of Legal Sciences] — M. — 1968. 35 p. (In Russian)
23. Vasin V. N., Kazantsev V. I. K voprosu o pravovoy prirode shtrafa [On the question of the legal character of the fine] // Rossiyskiy sudya [Russian judge]. — 2006. — No. 1. — Pp. 29–34. (In Russian)
24. Vaskin V. V. Vozmeshchenie ubytkov v grazhdansko-pravovykh obyazatelstvakh: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. [Compensation of losses in civil law obligations: autoreferat of the dissertation of Candidate of Legal Sciences.] — Saratov. — 1971. — 32 p. (In Russian)
25. Volkov A. V. Vozmeshchenie ubytkov po grazhdanskomu pravu Rossii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. [Compensation of losses under the Civil Law of Russia: dissertation of the Candidate of Legal Sciences] — Volgograd. — 2000. — 199 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Latypov D.N. Compensatory ways to protect civil rights in Russia. Kazan University Law Review. 2023;8(1):5-16. https://doi.org/10.30729/2541-8823-2023-8-1-5-16