kulrKazan University Law ReviewKazan University Law Review2541-88232686-7885Казанский (Приволжский) федеральный университет10.30729/2541-8823-2020-5-4-331-341kulr-91Research ArticleCOMMENTARIESProtection of civil rights through mechanism for suppression of unfair competition and avoidance of abuse of exclusive right to a trademarkFrolovaN. M.

Natalia Frolova (Moscow, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Assistant Professor

9 Sadovaya-Kudrunskaya St., 125993, Moscow

FrolovaNatali0307@yandex.ruKutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)Russian Federation20203012202054331341Copyright © Frolova N.M., 20202020Frolova N.M.Frolova N.M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://kulr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/91

The article investigates separate issues of civil rights protection in case of violation of balance of rights and interests of participants of civil legal relations due to unfair competition and abuse of exclusive right to a trademark. The paper focuses on the study of the essence of abuse of rights and unfair competition and how the two categories relate to each other. The author has analyzed the possibility to define some special corpus delicti constituting the abuse of the exclusive right to a trademark and unfair competition and made a conclusion about the inexpediency of the legislative definition of such corpus delicti. The analysis of judicial practice has revealed a number of criteria that should be taken into account when qualifying actions to acquire and exercise an exclusive right to a trademark as an abuse of right or unfair competition and an obligatory component of any composition is the bad faith of participants of civil legal relations.

unfair competitionabuse of exclusive righttrademarkbalance of interestsprotection of civil rightsmeans of protection of civil rightsgeneral limits of realization of rightslimits of subjective rightlimits of exercise of civil rightsexclusive right to a trademarkReferences[Grazhdanskoe pravo] Civil Law. Vol. 1/ Under the editorship of A.P. Sergeev and Y.K. Tolstoy. М., 1996.[Grazhdanskoe pravo] Civil Law. Vol. 1/ Under the editorship of A.P. Sergeev and Y.K. Tolstoy. М., 1996.[Kommentariy k chasti chetvertoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF] Commentary to Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation/ Under the editorship of A.L. Makovsky. М., 2008.[Kommentariy k chasti chetvertoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF] Commentary to Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation/ Under the editorship of A.L. Makovsky. М., 2008.Gribanov V.P. [Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav] Exercise and Protection of Civil Rights. М., 2001.Gribanov V.P. [Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav] Exercise and Protection of Civil Rights. М., 2001.Gavrilov E. [“Sredstva individualizatsii tovarov i kachestvennye kharakteristiki tovarov”] “Means of individualisation of goods and qualitative characteristics of goods” // Economy and Law. 2014. No.3.Gavrilov E. [“Sredstva individualizatsii tovarov i kachestvennye kharakteristiki tovarov”] “Means of individualisation of goods and qualitative characteristics of goods” // Economy and Law. 2014. No.3.Dozortsev V.A. [Intellektual’nye prava. Ponyatie. Sistema. Kodifikatsii.] Intellectual rights. Concept. System. Codification. M.: Statut, 2005.Dozortsev V.A. [Intellektual’nye prava. Ponyatie. Sistema. Kodifikatsii.] Intellectual rights. Concept. System. Codification. M.: Statut, 2005.Nazarov A.G. [Predely osushchestvleniya isklyuchitel’nogo prava na rezul’taty intellektual’noy deyatel’nosti] Limits of Exercising the Exclusive Right to the Results of Intellectual Activity. M.: Prospekt.2017.Nazarov A.G. [Predely osushchestvleniya isklyuchitel’nogo prava na rezul’taty intellektual’noy deyatel’nosti] Limits of Exercising the Exclusive Right to the Results of Intellectual Activity. M.: Prospekt.2017.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.