<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kulr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Kazan University Law Review</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Kazan University Law Review</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-8823</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2686-7885</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Казанский (Приволжский) федеральный университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30729/2541-8823-2019-4-1-51-57</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">kulr-46</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>COMMENTARIES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Interpretation of Wills in Russia. Call for Reform</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Interpretation of Wills in Russia. Call for Reform</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Petrov</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Petrov</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Evgenii Petrov, Associate Professor of Private Law, Candidate of Legal Sciences</p><p>103132; house 8 building 2, Ilyinka St.; Moscow</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Evgenii Petrov, Associate Professor of Private Law, Candidate of Legal Sciences</p><p>103132; house 8 building 2, Ilyinka St.; Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">info@privlaw.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Research Centre on behalf of S.S. Alekseev</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Research Centre on behalf of S.S. Alekseev</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>57</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Petrov E., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Petrov E.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Petrov E.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://kulr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/46">https://kulr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/46</self-uri><abstract><p>   The article describes the current rules and case law on drawing up wills in Russia. The author argues that the literal approach and the lack of stop-gap rules are hardly compatible with succession law policy. Due to the problem of correct interpretation of a will, we cannot talk about real testamentary freedom. The situations with wills are usually complicated because the authors are absent. As for interpretation of wills, the contemporary landscape shows that most of European countries prefer intentional approach: when the interpreter would take into account the indirect extrinsic evidence. Speaking of Russian approach, the priority is given to the literal interpretation: the methodological recommendations on drawing up the rights of inheritance clarify that in order to understand the literal meaning of words and phrases in the will, their plain meaning should be determined, and when interpreting the legal terms, their meaning set forth by the legislator in the corresponding legal instrument shall be used. On the base of comparative research and empirical experience “new” intentional approach is proposed.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>   The article describes the current rules and case law on drawing up wills in Russia. The author argues that the literal approach and the lack of stop-gap rules are hardly compatible with succession law policy. Due to the problem of correct interpretation of a will, we cannot talk about real testamentary freedom. The situations with wills are usually complicated because the authors are absent. As for interpretation of wills, the contemporary landscape shows that most of European countries prefer intentional approach: when the interpreter would take into account the indirect extrinsic evidence. Speaking of Russian approach, the priority is given to the literal interpretation: the methodological recommendations on drawing up the rights of inheritance clarify that in order to understand the literal meaning of words and phrases in the will, their plain meaning should be determined, and when interpreting the legal terms, their meaning set forth by the legislator in the corresponding legal instrument shall be used. On the base of comparative research and empirical experience “new” intentional approach is proposed.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>construction</kwd><kwd>will</kwd><kwd>testator</kwd><kwd>intention</kwd><kwd>interpretation</kwd><kwd>stop-gap rules</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>construction</kwd><kwd>will</kwd><kwd>testator</kwd><kwd>intention</kwd><kwd>interpretation</kwd><kwd>stop-gap rules</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abramenkov M.S. Tolkovanie i ispolnenie zaveshchaniya [Interpretation and execution of the will] // Nasledstvennoe pravo = Inheritance law. 2011. № 2 (SPS “Consultant Plus”). (in Russian)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abramenkov M.S. Tolkovanie i ispolnenie zaveshchaniya [Interpretation and execution of the will] // Nasledstvennoe pravo = Inheritance law. 2011. № 2 (SPS “Consultant Plus”). (in Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Antymonov B.S., Grave K.A. Sovetskoe nasledstvennoe pravo [Soviet inheritance law]. 1955 P. 186-187. (in Russian)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Antymonov B.S., Grave K.A. Sovetskoe nasledstvennoe pravo [Soviet inheritance law]. 1955 P. 186-187. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Häcker B. What’s in a Will? Examining the Modern Approach Towards the Interpretation and Rectification of Testamentary Instruments // Current Issues in Succession Law / Ed. by B. Häcker, Ch. Mitchell. P. 147.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Häcker B. What’s in a Will? Examining the Modern Approach Towards the Interpretation and Rectification of Testamentary Instruments // Current Issues in Succession Law / Ed. by B. Häcker, Ch. Mitchell. P. 147.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">John G. Ross Martyn, Jane Evans-Gordon, Alexander Learmonth, Charlotte Ford, Thomas Fletcher. Theobald on Will. 18 Edition. Thomson Reuters. 2016 P. 33, 39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">John G. Ross Martyn, Jane Evans-Gordon, Alexander Learmonth, Charlotte Ford, Thomas Fletcher. Theobald on Will. 18 Edition. Thomson Reuters. 2016 P. 33, 39.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kerridge R., Parry &amp; Kerridge The Law of Succession 13&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; . ed.2016. P.268 ff. Correction of technical errors when wrong wording was included (or proper was missed) in process of drafting is called rectification. In Marley v Rawlings (2014) rectification afforded to retain a will signed by Mr Rawling which was actually wil of his wife.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kerridge R., Parry &amp; Kerridge The Law of Succession 13&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; . ed.2016. P.268 ff. Correction of technical errors when wrong wording was included (or proper was missed) in process of drafting is called rectification. In Marley v Rawlings (2014) rectification afforded to retain a will signed by Mr Rawling which was actually wil of his wife.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rheinstein Max and Glendon Marry Ann. The Law of Decedents’ Estate. 1971. P. 466-476.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rheinstein Max and Glendon Marry Ann. The Law of Decedents’ Estate. 1971. P. 466-476.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Europian Private Law. 2012. Ed. by J. Basedow, K.J. Hopt, R. Zimmermann with A. Stier V.II. P.1775-1776 (author – S. Herler).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Europian Private Law. 2012. Ed. by J. Basedow, K.J. Hopt, R. Zimmermann with A. Stier V.II. P.1775-1776 (author – S. Herler).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
